Points Of View

Everyone seems to have their point of view. Related Group has firm opinions on the matter. Politicians, have yours, that normally does not match that of the citizen, provided, we are not close to an election. At that time they are so close to us that almost come to eat at home; If wasn’t because they already have booked any good restaurant or one of the best hotels in the city (by the way, is it pay us, because much of their income coming from the accounts of the State, as well as that of employers and trade unions). Past them, things become, as always, the alienation is inevitable, return to your world and forget about their promises and programs, where offered us all a world of hope and a good future. Suddenly a dark almost black horizon, because unfortunately, if the former was the opposition, it has been worse than was expected, so things are not as they had promised. But of course, if they are the same, the situation is so bad, that is impossible to trace as they would have liked. In short, us We were worse than what we were, because on top, we feel cheated.

This way of working is general for all parties, yet I have not seen any that really accountable and to solve the problems if escalates them a little, not to be, that force them to do so from the outside, because if not, see the plume. Really what we are witnessing, it is that the only thing that worries them is to perpetuate their privileges; covering the record with any of their projects not too committed, because if this were so, it would go dilating slowly, until the next parliamentary term, where we will return to promise the same as in the previous, and so on. Gives equal party, few differences I find, even more, I see that they have many points in common, at least in the essential and are safeguarding their privileges and status, that other mortals do not have. This is not to say, as parents of the motherland have no right to have any, but must earn it. This should be as in companies, at the end of the legislature, if they have done well, rush and if not the P Street with the minimum wage and to seek life as any worker. In this way would see you as they would work more and better, leaving nonsense. But I’m afraid that us is not arranged.

Chicago Theatre

This is a term found in the management literature on “leadership”, usually in combination with another term: the voice. The leader has a vision and has a voice to inspire others to follow his vision. This is what the director does. Often, even in a collaborative way (remember that we are still talking about improvisation, so when the rubber hits the road the team is on its own!). Take the second city, the famous Chicago Theatre, which gave us the likes of John Belushi, Dan Akroyd, Gilda Radner, and many more.

In the second city of the director will come to rehearsals with a vision, but the model comes with the content. (It is still “his show.) A coach on the other hand is best defined as in Timothy Callway the game of” Inside Tennis “? helps you get what is already there, helping others find their voice. This is as noble as it is difficult, especially when dealing with a whole cast of actors (professional or for that matter). Although I think I’m in the second category (no more of us? Think, I mean) that can fall back on the methodology and process as necessary. I think that especially in times of great uncertainty for hungry people a clear direction. If not provided, a then the most insecure, risk aversion, the worst that can handle uncertainty and change, will assume leadership roles. Because they think they have to (compare with the literature of dog training!) Thus, the coach has to provide sufficient guidance to maintain the level of leadership at a comfortable level for the team (team composition, of course, becomes important here too!).

Chicago Theatre

This is a term found in the management literature on “leadership”, usually in combination with another term: the voice. The leader has a vision and has a voice to inspire others to follow his vision. This is what the director does. Often, even in a collaborative way (remember that we are still talking about improvisation, so when the rubber hits the road the team is on its own!). Take the second city, the famous Chicago Theatre, which gave us the likes of John Belushi, Dan Akroyd, Gilda Radner, and many more.

In the second city of the director will come to rehearsals with a vision, but the model comes with the content. (It is still “his show.) A coach on the other hand is best defined as in Timothy Callway the game of” Inside Tennis “? helps you get what is already there, helping others find their voice. This is as noble as it is difficult, especially when dealing with a whole cast of actors (professional or for that matter). Although I think I’m in the second category (no more of us? Think, I mean) that can fall back on the methodology and process as necessary. I think that especially in times of great uncertainty for hungry people a clear direction. If not provided, a then the most insecure, risk aversion, the worst that can handle uncertainty and change, will assume leadership roles. Because they think they have to (compare with the literature of dog training!) Thus, the coach has to provide sufficient guidance to maintain the level of leadership at a comfortable level for the team (team composition, of course, becomes important here too!).

Chicago Theatre

This is a term found in the management literature on “leadership”, usually in combination with another term: the voice. The leader has a vision and has a voice to inspire others to follow his vision. This is what the director does. Often, even in a collaborative way (remember that we are still talking about improvisation, so when the rubber hits the road the team is on its own!). Take the second city, the famous Chicago Theatre, which gave us the likes of John Belushi, Dan Akroyd, Gilda Radner, and many more.

In the second city of the director will come to rehearsals with a vision, but the model comes with the content. (It is still “his show.) A coach on the other hand is best defined as in Timothy Callway the game of” Inside Tennis “? helps you get what is already there, helping others find their voice. This is as noble as it is difficult, especially when dealing with a whole cast of actors (professional or for that matter). Although I think I’m in the second category (no more of us? Think, I mean) that can fall back on the methodology and process as necessary. I think that especially in times of great uncertainty for hungry people a clear direction. If not provided, a then the most insecure, risk aversion, the worst that can handle uncertainty and change, will assume leadership roles. Because they think they have to (compare with the literature of dog training!) Thus, the coach has to provide sufficient guidance to maintain the level of leadership at a comfortable level for the team (team composition, of course, becomes important here too!).