part I am of those who believe, that scholars have a social meet, function which is the share the fruit of their intellectual work with their peers. Why is that some time ago, I started to make considerations about the substantial change that has been operating on the planet we inhabit and about ways to overcome difficult situations that you are considering us the current Argentine generations. Characterizes the current situation, as the post-cold war, where there has been a losing: the Soviet bloc and a Winner: the Western block led by the United States of America. The ideological paradigms of the Western bloc (United States and the rest of the members of the Group of seven, G.7) are the representative and Republican democracy and the market economy. Attentive to this new picture of world situation will have emphasized pre-existing in the West about trends of the need for structural adjustment, to leave behind the interventionist tendencies which emerged as responses to the great depression of the 1930s, and that led to the majority of Governments in non-socialist countries to strong State interventions.
These trends could not escape the Argentina, always sensitive, throughout its history, the events of the successive governing powers of the ORB. However, our country as a result of its formation as a national State, had already incorporated the State intervention in various areas, for this reason, the 1930s interventionist trends, its joined interventions pre-existing, with which is not ventured to assert that in the preceding five years, they have begun to remove situations dating back to the time of the enactment of the national Constitution of 1853. This persistence over time, has sedimented in the collective memory, and is in our view, one of the deep causes of resistances that some qualified sectors and personalities, triggers the March toward a market economy, which in our case of Argentina, passes through the roads of privatization, demonopolization and deregulation.